{label}…

{steps.map((s, k) => (

{k < i && } {s}

))}

); } function ReportHeader({ onBack, right }) { return (

YOUR MEETING READINESS REPORT {right || }

); } /* ---- Benchmark answers: what a strong reply sounds like ---- */ const BENCHMARKS = [ { k: 'Concise executive', a: 'Recommendation: approve a scoped two-week validation on enterprise. Success = +12% activation. If it misses, we proceed with the pivot as planned.', why: 'Leads with the decision and a clear kill condition.', sig: 'Decision ask · Risk handling', out: 'Dana can say yes in one breath.' }, { k: 'Evidence-first', a: 'Three enterprise deals stalled on this gap last quarter — €1.2M ARR. Give me two weeks to test whether a fix moves activation by the 12% we’d need.', why: 'Opens with the number, so the ask reads as a business case.', sig: 'Evidence strength', out: 'Dana debates scope, not whether it matters.' }, { k: 'Diplomatic pushback', a: 'I’m fully behind the pivot. I just want to de-risk it: a two-week validation on the blocked enterprise segment before we commit the full roadmap.', why: 'Aligns with the VP before introducing the ask.', sig: 'Stakeholder alignment · Tone', out: 'Lowers defensiveness on both sides.' }, { k: 'Principal PM', a: 'Let’s separate timing from impact. The enterprise block is a hidden cost we’re already paying — a narrow two-week validation tells us if it’s worth roadmap space, without reopening the plan.', why: 'Reframes the debate and contains the scope.', sig: 'Argument structure', out: 'Dana asks for the validation scope.' }, { k: 'Staff Engineer', a: 'Technically this is ~8 engineer-days behind a feature flag — low blast radius. Two weeks gives us a clean read on activation before we commit the larger build.', why: 'Quantifies effort and risk in engineering terms.', sig: 'Evidence · Risk handling', out: 'Removes the “is this expensive?” objection.' }, ]; function Benchmarks() { const [i, setI] = useState(0); const b = BENCHMARKS[i]; return ( Compare with a stronger answer

This is what “good” sounds like — pick a style to see how a strong operator would handle the pushback.

{BENCHMARKS.map((x, k) => ( ))}

{b.k.toUpperCase()} ANSWER

“{b.a}”

); } function BMRow({ label, v, col }) { return (

{label}

{v}

); } /* ---- Variant A / B readiness report ---- */ function Report({ variant, verdict, context, onBack, onPractice, onMap }) { const signals = context ? SIGNALS_CTX : SIGNALS; const followups = context ? FOLLOWUPS_CTX : FOLLOWUPS; const sigCount = signals.length === 7 ? 'SEVEN' : 'SIX'; return (

{/* title + score */}

READINESS REPORT · {SCENARIO.type.toUpperCase()}

{verdict ? 'You’re partly ready — fix 3 things first.' : 'Your meeting readiness report'}

{verdict ? 'Your meeting can work, but the decision ask, evidence, and stakeholder pushback need improvement before you walk in.' : 'Readiness is not a personality score. It measures whether your objective, evidence, argument, stakeholder handling, and next step are strong enough for the outcome you want.'}

{/* score + signals row */}

CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM HIGH STAKES

} onClick={variant === 'B' ? onMap : onPractice} sm style={{ width: '100%', justifyContent: 'center' }}>{variant === 'B' ? 'Map, then practice' : 'Practice this moment'}

{sigCount} READINESS SIGNALS

{signals.map((s, i) => )}

{/* risks + fixes */}

Top 3 risks

The 3 things most likely to hurt the outcome.

{TOP_RISKS.map((r, i) => (

{i + 1}

{r.t}

{r.d}

LEADS TO{r.cause}

))}

Top 3 fixes

Do these before you walk in.

{TOP_FIXES.map((r, i) => (

{r.t}

{r.d}

WHY{r.why}

{r.ex &&

“{r.ex}”

}

))}

{/* missing context (context-aware) */} {context && (

Missing context STRATEGIC FIT 5.6

Your message is clear, but it isn’t yet connected to the business context Dana will weigh it against.

{MISSING_CONTEXT.map((m, i) => (

{m.t}

{m.d}

ADD{m.fix}

))}

)} {/* follow ups */} Likely follow-up questions

Questions you should be ready to answer.

{followups.map((q, i) => ( ?“{q}” ))}

{/* benchmark answers */} {/* practice moment CTA */}

SUGGESTED PRACTICE MOMENT

Handle stakeholder pushback without sounding defensive.

One voice rep against {SCENARIO.stakeholderName}, {SCENARIO.stakeholderRole}. We score delivery and update your readiness.

{variant === 'B' && } onClick={onMap}>See predicted map} } onClick={variant === 'B' ? onMap : onPractice} style={{ whiteSpace: 'nowrap' }}> {variant === 'B' ? 'Map, then practice' : 'Practice this moment'}

); } Object.assign(window, { Report, Analyzing, ReportHeader, Benchmarks });